|
Caring for ourselves*
DR on TV*
What and Where*
Food Choices*
Ask a Rabbit*
Endometriosis*
Nature Corner*
Tasty Tidbit
|
Ask a Rabbit

Ted examining a young nectarine tree in Ironweed
garden
What's the difference between an intentional
community and a commune?
Rabbit 1: I feel like commune implies
income-sharing, or being more fully communal in
terms of property.
Rabbit 2: I don't think it's wrong to
use ''commune'' to mean any level of sharing.
To me, there isn't a whole lot of difference.
Saying ''intentional community'' is a way to avoid
the pejorative nature of the word commune. Some
folks want to reclaim the word; others want to
avoid bringing up the negative associations. Personally,
I would be comfortable calling Skyhouse a commune.
Ask
a Rabbit is a new March Hare feature.
A few members gathered to share
their thoughts on some intriguing
topics. The questions were sent
to us by Errol, a regular reader
of the weekly DR column, which
is published in our local newspaper
and is also available by email
and on our website. Feel free
to send your questions for Ask
a Rabbit to askarabbit@dancingrabbit.org.
Rabbit 3 [smiling]: Intentional community--
a commune with forethought.
What kind of care for the elderly will
DR provide?
Rabbit 7: At Findhorn [non-income-sharing]
community, there is a team of people dedicated
to checking up on aged members-- to knowing who
had what health problems, and who was taking medication
for what. Things like that. I think it's important
to have a system in place, even if you would hope
that there would be enough community feeling to
provide care.
Rabbit 3: I've had musings about establishing
an elder care facility. It would be eco-focused,
and welcome people who are not very interested
in Western-type technology for prolonging life.
Rabbit 4: I think it would be cool if
we ended up with more group houses, especially
if there was a diversity of age within each house,
with the younger people having some sort of commitment--
not necessarily a blood-relation-- to the elders.
Rabbit 2: Right now, the model in mainstream society
involves paying for care. In the past, friends
and neighbors were more likely to provide that
care. I can't really say for sure which I think
Dancing Rabbit will follow in the future. If someone
coming in as a member was getting Social Security
income, they would be rich by our standards, and
maybe wouldn't mind paying for some of the more
involved care.

Rabbits aren't the only ones looking for a healthy snack
Rabbit 7: I think it will be better here
than in the mainstream because there won't be
so much age-segregation. That leads to isolation
so often, and depression in the elderly. Life
in community seems like it would lessen issues
of not feeling needed and valuable.
Rabbit 2: Here, though, there are certain
physical tasks, like bringing in firewood or emptying
humanure buckets. That would be more difficult,
if not impossible without help, for certain individuals.
But, hopefully, as we grow there will be enough
people that no one will end up feeling lonely,
unless that's what they want.
Rabbit 4: If we had some sort of fund--
like a DR social security-- that we built up over
time . . . maybe that would be good. But maybe
it wouldn't always feel good to everyone to pay
into it.
Rabbit 2: I would pay into something
like that. Not just for the feeling of security
for myself, either. I would want to support care
being given, even if it weren't a safety net for
everything. Even if it just covered checking up
on people, and chopping firewood, and things like
that.
Rabbit 7: I definitely feel the need
for some sort of set system, no matter what it
is.
Rabbit 4: We've already had situations
with people who have injured their arms where
it's been difficult to find people able to give
consistent help. How would we handle it better
in the future? Do you feel like once we're larger,
and less people are involved with trying to get
their own basic needs met, that a sense of giving
will come more easily?
Rabbits 2 and 3: Yes. When we're larger,
it will definitely make a difference.
Rabbit 4: And with accommodations like
Rabbit 3 mentioned, it would be easier to give
daily care, since everyone needing it would be
in the same building.
Rabbit 3: A lot of care besides chopping
wood and such could be needed. There will be people
who need help eating or getting out of bed, or
getting to and from poopers.
Rabbit 2: Even here, I think we'll have
people not wanting to leave their homes to go
to a larger care facility, but if there was a
common day building they could receive daily care
there. Then, they could go home to sleep, and
still feel like they didn't have to give up independence
all at once.
Rabbit 3: It sure sounds easier than
the situation with my grandmother. My mother had
to spend quite a lot of driving time getting her
to and from the day care.
Rabbit 4: People could also plan for
having live-in care, if that was what they wanted,
when planning their houses. If you built an extra
room in, maybe you could have someone live rent-free
with you in exchange for care. That would be a
way for both people to get what they needed, and
hopefully promote the inter-generational living
arrangements.
Rabbit 6: Another way to do that would
be to have four apartments surrounding a common
space, with one apartment reserved for someone
who needed care, including an elder.
And what about green burial at DR?
The Missouri regulations for home burial, and how it would work for a group of unrelated individuals living on a land trust-- whew, that's a fascinating and potentially complicated mix. Through some quick research, we found that it's fairly easy to get a family burial plot in Missouri. However, embedded in a long list of regulations, ''family plot'' was described as pertaining only to departed connected by blood or marriage. Hmmph. Further searching yielded basic information about ''fraternal cemeteries.'' Perhaps we could qualify for one of those. We'll certainly keep you posted with what we find out.
Regulations aside, for the time being, all Rabbits polled agreed that green burial is definitely a part of their vision for DR. While there has been light talk from time to time about using it as a business venture, the majority of Rabbits simply want to care for their own dead.
Rabbit 2: That way you get the closure
that comes with the burial process.
Rabbit 5: That way you also get to compost.
Rabbit 3: I wouldn't mind being chopped
up and put in a compost pile, as long as it got
up to proper temperature.
Rabbit 2: Okay . . . [resumes seriousness]
I was more thinking that people could be buried
in areas throughout the village, like in shady
corners. You could put a bench in and plant a
nut tree. That way you could sit by this beautiful,
long-lived tree and feel close to the person.
Rabbit 4: Or, if you had to or wanted
to cluster the bodies more, the burial ground
could also be an orchard.
Rabbit 6: Permaculture at its best.
Rabbit 3: Or what about a prairie burial?
You could wrap the body in cotton or in hemp,
and prairie forbs could get planted over the top.
Editor: As you can see, there were
a variety of specific ideas, and some amount of
humor in the conversation. However, many spoke to
the feeling of wanting to personalize the mourning
process, and to return to the view of home burial
as both a necessity and an act of love. Of course,
the idea of enriching the ecosystem as one passes
from life, rather than poisoning it, is also deeply
appealing.
For more information about home burial in general, you may want to read these books:
Coming to Rest by Julie Wiskind and Richard Spiegel
Caring for the Dead by Lisa Carlson
Caring for ourselves*
DR on TV*
What and Where*
Food Choices*
Ask a Rabbit*
Endometriosis*
Nature Corner*
Tasty Tidbit
Back to Newsletter Archives
|